Why the Obamacare 2016 Open Enrollment Stalled: The Big Unwritten Story About Obamacare––How Unaffordable It Is For the Working and Middle Class

Now that the most recent Open Enrollment period for the "Affordable Care Act" has ended, Bob Laszewski has written another article about the law and its impact that is right on the money.  The big "untold" story is about how it has impacted premiums for the segment of the individual market that do not qualify for subsidies and now have to bear the weight of astronomical premium increases.

You can read Bob Laszewski's blog post here . . . .

A Detailed Analysis of the Republican Alternative to Obamacare

Bob Laszewski has offered a detailed look at the Republican's alternative to "Obamacare".  I agree with Bob, that it may have been easier to accept "Obamacare" as the baseline, in need of major renovations - but it seems that it won't happen.

Some of the ideas in these proposals make perfect sense, but they will have different consequences for different consumers within the market.  The other big challenge here is that these solutions proposed are also very complicated for the average person to really understand.  What do you think?

Here's Bob's article . . . .Health Care Policy and Marketplace Review - Bob Laszewski

Congress Is Back And Looking At Limiting Your Health Insurance Choices - But Now It's About Medicare!

Yes, that's right!  They are busy at work to begin examining ways to limit a Medicare Eligible person's insurance options.  Like your Medicare supplement?  Want to buy one that offers full coverage, and pays for gaps that Medicare does not cover?  Well, you may not have that option anymore if certain members of Congress get their way.

This article explains some of the options that were discussed at the hearing to discuss ways to solve the physician pay "sustainable growth rate" (SGR) problem - or "doc fix" as some call it:

"Why Medigap Sellers' Ears are Burning"

I guess I am mystified as to how limiting the purchase of a private insurance plan that only pays after Medicare pays its share, or eliminating certain types of private coverage help reign in Medicare spending on the whole.  The argument is that if you give someone the option to buy "first dollar" coverage, they will over-utilize medical care. 

I know that based on the people I deal with regularly in my own client base, many of my people who purchase first dollar coverage for themselves do not over-utilize care.  If anything, many of them are healthy people.  They have the means to buy the best coverage that they can, and do so - for peace of mind.

That should be their option.  If you have the money, and want a good plan - you should be able to purchase it.

When the whole notion of limiting over-utilization in the under 65 health insurance market were done after the advent of "high deductible" health plans were introduced, studies showed that in some instances, medical expenditures actually rose due to the fact that people delayed seeking care when they really needed it. Some ended up spending more on reactive care that could have been prevented if they had sought care initially.

The Congressional representatives who always talk about this issue of "over-utilization" continually talk about the patient having more "skin in the game".  This always strikes me as ludicrous coming from a set of people who have no "skin in the game" at all. 

They have coverage provided to them via the Federal Government that we all pay for.  Maybe they should have their own "skin in the game" and have to purchase insurance on the open market like the rest of us.

If members of Congress had to go to Medicare at age 65, and then find ways to supplement their coverage - don't you think most of them would be purchasing first dollar coverage for themselves? They can certainly afford it. 

In addition, if they had to have Medicare as their primary means of insurance coverage, they would have to acquire Medicare Part B, which at their salary levels would also result in them having to pay the Income Related Monthly Adjustment Amount or IRMAA.

Forcing members of Congress - and all Federal employees and retirees for that matter - to go into full Medicare at 65 could be a better way to fund the SGR problem.  With the extra money from their part B premiums, and the IRMAA that would also be collected, we could probably bring enough money into the basic Medicare program to fund it without denying the rest of the American public choices on the private market that work for them.

But - don't worry, even though no patient advocacy groups were represented at the hearing, I'm sure Congress will consider the needs of the American public first!  Right? . . . .

The Next Chapter of Obamacare

As we approach this next enrollment period (11/15/2014 - 02/15/2015) for individuals and families under the Affordable Care Act there are some things to be considered.

People who are receiving subsidies today, are being told that they can "do nothing" and automatically be re-enrolled in the plan they have today.  If that plan isn't going to be available for 2015, the insurance carrier will place you in a plan that's close.

But - even if you do want to keep the plan you have, you must keep in mind that if you do nothing, the subsidy amount you are currently receiving will stay the same and your share of the premium that you'll have to pay could increase.

So, most ACA subsidy recipients, should really go to the website (Healthcare.gov) when the enrollment period begins to re-apply and do a subsidy re-determination at that time for the year 2015.  If you don't, you may be surprised when the January 2015 bill comes.

In addition, you may want to re-visit things, simply because there will be some new plan offerings and, in some cases, some new carriers available on the exchange in your area.

Some of the Pre-ACA plans will only extend through the end of 2014 for some, so even if you are not receiving any subsidy money, you'll need to go shopping for a plan to begin on January 1.  If you don't qualify for the subsidy money, you can purchase "off-exchange" plans from a variety of sources - including your local agent or broker.

If you do qualify for subsidy money, then you can get assistance from a Navigator, Agent, or broker to review the process, help you access the local exchange in your area, and assist you with selecting plans.

People who had grandfathered plans (meaning, they were effective prior to 3/23/2010) can keep them as long as they desire.  Some others have received extensions of pre-ACA style plans that are not grandfathered beyond the year 2014.  Even though people can keep these plans - they must pay attention to note any rate activity on the plans that they currently have.  That may affect a decision on what to do in the coming year.

Each of you should be receiving some type of communication from your insurance carrier regarding your personal situation.

 - For policies to be effective on January 1, 2015 (i.e., for those who will absolutely lose coverage at the end of December 2014), you'll have to shop and be enrolled no later than December 15, 2014.

 - If you enroll by 1/15/2015, you'll have an effective date of 2/1/2015.  If you enroll by 2/15/2015, then your insurance will be effective on 3/1/2015.

 - If you do nothing, your insurance will continue and any price changes will be reflected in your first billing cycle in 2015.

Bob Laszewski's latest blog post outlines many things to be considered.  Read the blogpost here . . . .

Tax refunds may get hit due to health law credits

Get ready - here it comes!  Now that we're approaching the end of the year it's time to consider whether or not those of you who are benefitting from Advanced Tax Credits to pay for their health insurance underestimated their 2014 income.  If so, you may be subject to claw-backs at tax time.

This consideration also must be taken into account before the upcoming enrollment period, which is from 11/14/2014 through 2/15/2015.    During this next enrollment, you'll have to "estimate" your 2015 income.  If you've miscalculated for 2014, you'll want to be sure you don't build on that mistake.

Read the AP Article here . . . .

CMS Proposal Would Penalize More Than 2600 Hospitals

This article points out some of the problems with penalizing hospitals for readmission of patients. One thing I've seen my clients experience personally is the phenomenon of being "held for observation" as an outpatient resulting in the Medicare patient being stuck with 20% outpatient coinsurance for everything that happens - which can be thousands of dollars in billing.  In their zeal to cut back on "short stays" in hospitals and "readmissions" -hospitals are hesitant to admit anyone as an inpatient.  As the article points out, they aren't clear on what parameters they are being measured on in the first place - they find out when they get the penalty.

You can read the complete article here:

Researcher Says CMS Proposal Would Penalize More Than 2600 Hospitals

IRS and Department of the Treasury Release Guidance Related to Healthcare & Insurance

This week, the IRS and Department of Treasury released frequently asked questions to assist agents, brokers, and employers on provisions of the Affordable Care Act. The link below provides additional guidance on employer shared responsibility, seasonal worker coverage, minimum value, and small business healthcare tax credits. The new FAQs can be accessed, along with existing FAQs, from the IRS Q&A index page at the link below. The new questions are accessible in the employer shared responsibility, small business tax credit, and employer health care plans sections. http://www.irs.gov/uac/Newsroom/Affordable-Care-Act-Tax-Provisions-Questions-and-Answers If you'd like information regarding the Premium Tax Credits for Individuals and Families see the following link: http://www.irs.gov/uac/Newsroom/Questions-and-Answers-on-the-Premium-Tax-Credit   Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has sent this Y1 AB MLN Curriculum Update. To contact Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) go to our contact us page.

Are ObamaCare's Tax Credits Harmless? The Little Understood Dark Side Of The Subsidies

Now that the first annual enrollment through the new Health Care Exchanges has ended, it's important to understand how the subsidies that many have received to assist with paying their insurance premiums will be handled by the IRS.  Forbes published a good article regarding how fluctuations in income and other life changes, could affect how the subsidy that you receive can change. 

If your income changes, or your life circumstances change that can affect household income levels, YOU are required to notify the health insurance marketplace (exchange), so that the subsidy can be adjusted accordingly.  If you do not do that, the government will make the adjustments at tax time.

Read more about the way the subsidies work here . . . .

Many have benefitted from the subsidy allocation, but with that benefit comes a responsibility to report any changes that could significantly impact your household income - otherwise there will be tax implications.

What Are The Penalties For Not Getting Insurance By The March 31st Deadline?

Here's a very good synopsis of how the penalty works under the new healthcare law.  As we enter the last phase of the enrollment, many who have not purchased insurance may still be contemplating whether or not to buy it, or whether they should just pay the penalty.  This may help clarify that decision.

Individual Insurance Mandate & Associated Penalty Calculation

There is still a full week left to obtain coverage.  I'm busy helping people this week, but you can also go directly to Healthcare.gov or to a local Navigator to obtain coverage.

Obamacare: To Buy Or Not To Buy–––An Entrepreneur Would Have Done It Differently

Bob Laszewski's blogpost today discusses how the plans under the new Affordable Care Act were built and whether or not people will actually purchase them.  I have had discussions about this with my clients, as to what they will decide to do at the end of 2014, when they will no longer be able to hang on to their 2013 style insurance plans any longer.

Many of these people are self-employed, and do not qualify for any type of subsidy.  Most of them are relatively healthy, and have always carried health insurance on their own.  And yes, it was "real" insurance - not sub-standard coverage.  When the time comes for them to choose an ACA style plan next year for coverage to take effect in the year 2015, they are going to find that their premiums without a subsidy will double in many cases.  The reason for that is that all of the current plans include all of the "essential health benefits" that the government built into every health plan, whether you deem it essential or not.

That is not to say that plans previously didn't have their problems - access to maternity coverage was a huge problem in the individual market.  Often, it was not even offered as an option.  But, maybe they could have found a solution like having every insurance company offer a maternity "option", that people who wanted the coverage could purchase - rather than build it into every plan.  Same for things like pediatric dental.  There were many other ways to have offered these benefits to people rather than baking them into every plan.

As an individual in the marketplace, I should have the right to purchase a catastrophic plan if I so choose, but that right was also taken from me, in the government's zeal to have everyone own a plan that looked very much like employer based plans look and feel.  Well, that's great, if you have an employer either paying for the plan, or kicking in 50% or more.  For those of us who are self employed, or work in places where no health insurance is offered, buying a Cadillac is just not a feasible proposition.

Keep in mind too, that the self employed also pay the maximum amount already on things like social security contributions and Medicare contributions in the form of self-employment tax, since they don't have an employer kicking in a portion of that.  Read Bob's Blogpost Here . . . .

Obamacare Week 10––A Dearth of Enrollment In the States and Continuing Backroom Problems

Here's an update from Bob Laszewski regarding the current status of the enrollments through the Federal Marketplaces, and in the states that currently have a state run marketplace.  There is also data here about how various aspects of system corrections and development are going. 

The one point here that I found very troubling was the item that notes that the federal government hasn't built a payment system that would provide insurance companies with the premium subsidy payments.  They are expecting the insurance companies to bill them for these amounts.  It makes me wonder how long it will take them to get paid, and how that money will be tracked through the various private & government systems.

Also troubling was all of the confusion and inability to deal with Medicaid enrollments.

We'll see how the end of the year plays out.  I am hearing from people I deal with that they are actually able to get through the process now using Healthcare.gov, so at least they've made improvements there and some are getting approved for subsidies and enrolled.  Let's hope the improvements continue.

To read Bob's blog entry, please click here.

Some Little Known Subsidy Cuts to "Safety-Net" Hospitals, May Leave Some Without Care . . . . .

As various subsidies to hospitals that provide care to the uninsured, especially those that do not qualify for Medicaid, are implemented - some could be left with nowhere to go for much needed medical care.

The Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act would have provided coverage to many of these people.  But - since Supreme Court ruled that the states would have to be given the ability to "opt out" of the Medicaid expansion, many did.  That leaves a gaping hole in the body of people who would have been covered by the expansion.  Without the expansion, many of these individuals will not qualify for Medicaid - AND - they may not qualify for a federal subsidy to purchase health insurance through the new health insurance marketplaces.  An individual must have a Modified Adjusted Gross income of $11,490 to qualify for a subsidy.  If you make less, but do not qualify for Medicaid coverage, you will have no options other than to pay full price for a health insurance policy - which many cannot possibly afford.

Hospitals that previously might have cared for these patients because they were subsidized for doing so, will now have those subsidies cut and may need to begin to refuse care or turn people away.

The Wall Street Journal published a good article that explains the predicament very well.  Read more here . . . .

Obviously, some adjustments will need to be made to the health care law to compensate for these unexpected situations arising out of modifications in the law to date.  A lot of delivery of care and coverage issues were hoped to be solved with the Medicaid expansion.  Since that was limited significantly, large groups of people who had counted on it as a mechanism for health care coverage will be left behind once again and will remain uncovered, unless something is done to correct that.

"Bad Apples?" - Really?

Although there were some policies sold in the individual insurance market in the past that were not what I'd term "real major medical insurance", I know that those of us in the agent community did our best to educate our consumers and make sure they understood the differences and what to look for in a legitimate policy. 

My clients all had policies that offered them a good amount of financial protection for the money.  Yes - there were trade offs - if you wanted a lower premium, you could raise the deductible, or forgo other benefits.  But my clients made  those choices after discussing the ramifications of those decisions, so that they would buy a policy that would protect them in the ways that they thought were important to them.

The President made it sound as if the individual market was the wild, wild west and this total overhaul was the only way to protect the public.

Also, in the hearings on Capital Hill, they never once advised that people could get advice, or help from independent agents (like myself), while they try to fix their broken system and can't handle the phone traffic coming into their call centers with questions.

As Bob Laszewski sites in his post that follows, you begin to wonder if they understood anything about our insurance system at all.  I never would have dreamed that to be the case, considering that Kathleen Sebelius ran the Dept. of Insurance in Kansas before she was Governor.  I guess memories are short . . . . .

Health Policy and Marketplace Review

Personally, if my policy loses its "grandfathered" status, I have no idea how I'd ever afford an ACA compliant plan that would be comparable.  Hopefully, I won't have to ponder that decision (or "non-choice")  for awhile . . . . .

Missouri Exchange Rates - A Snapshot

Many of my clients in MO have been wondering what rates for the new ACA compliant insurance plans will cost.  Here is a quick snapshot of what the rates currently look like.

Snapshot of Missouri Exchange Rates

Those who are eligible for a subsidy, would be able to have some help paying for these plans.  You can use the calculator below to determine how much help you might receive.  I've posted this before, but here it is again.

Kaiser Foundation Subsidy Calculator

Since Healthcare.gov hasn't been accessible, using the tools above may be a quick way to estimate what your premiums might be under the new system.

If you don't need the federal money, there are plenty of plans that you can buy "off-exchange" if you need to purchase insurance.

If you already have insurance, you may want to keep your current plan, if you are able to do so.

As always, my clients can always e-mail me or call with questions.

Should the Administration shut down Healthcare.gov?

Bob Laszewski asks that very question in his blog post today.  Another insightful entry from Bob about the computer system and its continued failing.

As I've stated before, if you do not need the federal subsidy money and can keep your current individual health insurance policy, do so for as long as you're able. Based on what I've seen, the new ACA compliant plans are more expensive overall in this geography (Kansas City metro).

If you do have to shop - there are plenty of "off exchange" plans (plans sold outside of the federal marketplace) where you can purchase an ACA compliant plan for individuals and families.  The carriers have plans up on most of their own websites now, and eventually, I'll be able to run side by side quotes for these new plans.  To date, it's been impossible to do so, since most data resources at the insurance carriers and other entities (like the quoting engines most agents use) have been overwhelmed. 

That said, I do believe visibility to plans outside of the federal marketplace will increase greatly during the coming month or so.  So - for those who have been unable to buy health insurance in the past due to medical conditions, you'll definitely be able to fulfill the requirement to carry insurance.  The jury is still out as to whether or not you'll be able to get online at the Healthcare.gov website.

Read Bob's blog post here . . . .

Healthcare.gov Offers New Shopping Feature - Sort of . . . .

Here's a link to the Kaiser Foundation Blog describing the new "shopping feature" on Healthcare.gov. 

Read the Kaiser Foundation Blog Entry here . . . .

Limited as the shopping feature is, I guess it's better than nothing.  How they could have developed a huge system like Healthcare.Gov and not understood that people want to see rates & plan information before deciding to create an account and then load a ton of personal information into the system blindly.

They wasted a lot of money on a dysfunctional system and are now having to spend more to remedy it without having to totally dismantle it.  In the meantime, people who may have wanted to purchase insurance there, cannot.  I guess people may have to phone in applications or do them on paper - you know, just like in the "good old days" . . .

Monthly Premiums For A 'Benchmark' Silver Plan In Federally Run Insurance Marketplaces

Here we are one day before the October 1 enrollment through the Federal Marketplaces begins for those of you who are under the age of 65 and do not receive insurance through your employer.

I still do not have actual pricing from any of my carriers in Missouri or Kansas yet, so advising people as to what to do has been difficult, if not impossible. 

Some of you who have "grandfathered" plans - meaning your plan effective date was prior to March 23, 2010 - can keep the plan you currently have.

Those of you who do not have a "grandfathered" plan may be able to keep your existing policy for an additional year, depending on how your existing carrier is handling things.  In these cases you may have received a letter already indicating that this option will be available to you and that you'll simply sign an addendum in December, most likely, and agree to a small rate increase at that time.  This would allow you to continue with your plan through the end of December 2014.

Depending on what the new plan pricing looks like, the options above may be appealing.

Those of you who feel you will qualify for Federal subsidies will have to apply through the exchanges to receive the federal money.

I am certified to sell policies within the exchanges, but do not know what that process will look like yet, since the exchanges (or marketplaces, as the Federal Government is referring to them) do not exist yet.  Supposedly these will be online tomorrow, October 1.

Once I have detailed plan & pricing information, I'll share that with all of my individual and family clients.

The article from the Kaiser Foundation this morning offers an idea of what a Silver plan may cost in various "areas" within a state where the Federal Marketplace will be offering plans.  You can see that here . . .Benchmarks for Silver Plans through the Marketplaces.

Simply find your county and you'll see how rates compare with other areas of your state.

Within this article you'll also see the link for the subsidy calculator where you can play around with your numbers to see what might happen in real time once the Federal Marketplaces are operational.

Once I see that enrollments are going smoothly I'll discuss options with my clients.  In the meantime, I'd advise waiting to see how the initial launch goes, before making changes.  (but, that's just my opinion . . . .)

Is the Affordable Care Act Actually Affordable?

I've been wondering that myself as I complete the training associated with being able to assist clients as the law is implemented.

My conclusion is that maybe it won't be - especially for some segments of the population.  Even with the federal subsidy money, I've been wondering whether or not people with very limited incomes will be able to afford the portion of the health insurance premium that is left for them to pay once the subsidy is taken into account.  Apparently, I'm not the only one.

This article from AlterNet takes a closer look:

Read the full article here.

Enrollment for new, ACA compliant plans is scheduled to begin on October 1 and will continue through 12/31/2013.  This is an extended enrollment period, since the government realizes that there will be a lot of confusion in the marketplace about when they must enroll or make changes.  After this year, the annual enrollment period for individuals and families under the age of 65 will be from October 15 - December 7 each year.

As new information becomes available, I'll be sure to communicate it.

UPS Won't Insure Spouses of Some Employees

UPS is getting ready to remove thousands of spouses from their company provided group health insurance, in part due to the new healthcare law.  They have cited the Affordable Care Act as one of the reasons for its decision when explaining this to employees and others.  Read the article here . . . .

Many Consumers With High-Deductible Plans Are Concerned About Health Law Changes

For those of you who didn't know - unless your current individual or family health insurance policy is considered to be a 'grandfathered' plan - meaning, the plan effective date was prior to 3/23/2010 (when the new Health care law was signed) - you'll have to make some changes for plans effective on 1/1/2014.  Read more here . . .

Different companies are taking different approaches to this "migration", as they are calling it.  Some are simply ending your existing coverage as of 12/31/2013, and requiring you to purchase a new policy during annual enrollment - which takes place beginning October 1, 2013 for plans that will be effective on 1/1/2014.

Other companies are going to allow you to stay on your current 'non-grandfathered' plan, and they'll simply add essential health benefits and other features to make the plan compliant.  In those cases, companies will simply have you agree to that and any price changes, through the use of an addendum that the insured will sign, and you'd keep your plan through the end of 2014.

I am beginning to contact my clients to let them know what the options will be this fall.  Unfortunately, no pricing is available yet, so I'm only able to discuss potential situations, not real choices.  Some people will qualify for subsidies through the exchanges - if you're an individual and make up to $45,960 annually, you'd qualify.  The guideline is that there will be subsidies available for those making up to 400% above the poverty level.  In some geographic markets, that is a good amount of money, so many may qualify.

You can play around with the subsidy calculator below to get an idea of whether or not you & others in your household might qualify for subsidies being offered to help pay for new plans effective next year.

Health Insurance Subsidy Calculator